| From: | Markus Bertheau <twanger(at)bluetwanger(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Derek Hamilton <derek(at)capweb(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Firebird vrs Postgresql |
| Date: | 2003-07-15 22:04:49 |
| Message-ID: | 1058306688.2635.23.camel@saphir |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
В Втр, 15.07.2003, в 23:32, Derek Hamilton пишет:
> I'm not sure this is still the case, but I recently chose PostgreSQL over
> Firebird because Firebird requires direct access to the database file.
> There is no way to access it via TCP/IP with drivers, etc. That killed
> Firebird in my mind.
It's not like that anymore, you "just" need to know the path to the
database file on the remote server. It has the ability to spread a
database over several files to overcome OS limitations to the file size,
but it's not transparent iirc. Firebirds concept of a database name in
PostgreSQL is a filename on the servers file system. Other that that
it's a serious database.
--
Markus Bertheau.
Berlin, Berlin.
Germany.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | scott.marlowe | 2003-07-15 22:18:44 | Re: Firebird vrs Postgresql |
| Previous Message | Ian Barwick | 2003-07-15 21:57:32 | Re: migrating data from 7.3.x down to 7.2.x |