From: | Kim Ho <kho(at)redhat(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Fernando Nasser <fnasser(at)redhat(dot)com> |
Cc: | Darin Ohashi <DOhashi(at)maplesoft(dot)com>, pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: BIT vs boolean |
Date: | 2003-06-27 21:49:19 |
Message-ID: | 1056750559.5081.12.camel@cpe000475c4cd62-cm013279901416.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-jdbc |
On Fri, 2003-06-27 at 16:33, Fernando Nasser wrote:
> I think there is a patch posted for this already.
> Kim can confirm if that is so.
>
I don't have one for it, but I could whip one up fairly quickly.
I was going to do it for my patch, but I got sidetracked apparently. I
remember looking at it though. The reason why it doesn't work is:
It is actually
insert into bittable values (b'1');
instead of
insert into bittable values (true);
Will look at it either later tonight or tomorrow.
Cheers,
Kim
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Kim Ho | 2003-06-27 22:28:27 | Re: Allow setObject(x,y,Types.BIT) if y is a Number & |
Previous Message | Garrick Dasbach | 2003-06-27 20:57:25 | Re: executeQuery and busy waiting |