| From: | Rod Taylor <rbt(at)rbt(dot)ca> |
|---|---|
| To: | Dann Corbit <DCorbit(at)connx(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>, Jason Earl <jason(dot)earl(at)simplot(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Two weeks to feature freeze |
| Date: | 2003-06-21 12:50:57 |
| Message-ID: | 1056199856.42342.21.camel@jester |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> > PostgreSQL has a comprehensive regression suite that is run
> > by the developers all the time...
>
> If you mean the one that comes with PostgreSQL, then I think the MySQL
> test is better. The PostgreSQL test seems to focus more on extensions
> than anything else.
I would be happy to make additions to the regression tests if you can
give me a list of items that are missing. I've looked and didn't see
anything obvious aside from inter-connection testing. Yes, tests run in
parallel on multiple connections, but there is no interaction between
since there is not a method of controlling the timing at the moment.
--
Rod Taylor <rbt(at)rbt(dot)ca>
PGP Key: http://www.rbt.ca/rbtpub.asc
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2003-06-21 12:51:17 | Re: Two weeks to feature freeze |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2003-06-21 12:50:56 | Re: Two weeks to feature freeze |