| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Documentation for partitioned indexes? |
| Date: | 2019-04-26 19:14:32 |
| Message-ID: | 10560.1556306072@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs |
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> I suppose I better add something in Chapter 5 (DDL), possibly inside the
> 5.10 section (Table Partitioning) -- a new 5.10.6 "Indexes for
> Partitioned Tables" perhaps?
I was expecting to find it in "5.11.2.2. Partition Maintenance".
The structure of 5.11 seems a bit weird already, in that important
(IMO) topics like preferred maintenance procedures are buried at
a lower nesting level than essentially-historical trivia like
"5.11.3. Implementation Using Inheritance". But maybe right now
is not the time to redesign that.
BTW, is there anything equivalent for unique/pkey constraints?
I tried "add constraint unique ... not valid" and just got a
raspberry.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jonathan S. Katz | 2019-04-26 19:14:35 | Re: SET ROLE documentation not entirely correct |
| Previous Message | Jonathan S. Katz | 2019-04-26 19:07:32 | Re: Documentation for partitioned indexes? |