Re: src/bin/scripts seems a bit of a misnomer now

From: Rod Taylor <rbt(at)rbt(dot)ca>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: src/bin/scripts seems a bit of a misnomer now
Date: 2003-06-18 17:47:59
Message-ID: 1055958478.48114.58.camel@jester
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, 2003-06-18 at 17:07, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > With Peter's latest commit, there aren't any actual scripts left in
> > src/bin/scripts; only C programs. Does that bother anyone? I was
> > wondering about renaming to something like src/bin/misc. (Not that
> > that name seems very compelling either...)
>
> We could call it tools or admintools.

How about just pulling them up a directory into src/bin?

If they were complex, each would have a subdirectory in src/bin, so it
seems reasonable to have individual files there.
--
Rod Taylor <rbt(at)rbt(dot)ca>

PGP Key: http://www.rbt.ca/rbtpub.asc

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2003-06-18 17:59:25 Re: information Windows - PostgreSQL
Previous Message Merlin Moncure 2003-06-18 17:30:49 Re: information Windows - PostgreSQL