| From: | Alan Searles <alien(at)attglobal(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net> |
| Cc: | pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Converting IBM DB2 TRIGGERs to PostgreSQL |
| Date: | 2003-06-13 12:13:54 |
| Message-ID: | 1055506434.1087.12.camel@aurora |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-novice |
Robert...you are probably under the impression that I some sort of
expert in DB2 -- that would be incorrect !! Over the years. I have
scratched my way to gain some understanding of it. That's it.
When it comes to "BEGIN ATOMIC" references within TRIGGER statements...I
have NO idea. Where/Why the reference to "ATOMIC" I can not guess.
Sounds impressive though.
/Alan
On Thu, 2003-06-12 at 11:32, Robert Treat wrote:
> On Wed, 2003-06-11 at 01:25, Josh Berkus wrote:
> >
> > BTW, the "BEGIN ATOMIC" is superfluous in PostgreSQL; triggers are atomic by
> > definition.
> >
>
> Hey Alan, is there any other type of "BEGIN's" that are allowed in DB2
> functions?
>
> Robert Treat
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Nabil Sayegh | 2003-06-13 13:08:50 | Re: number of rows |
| Previous Message | Michael Glaesemann | 2003-06-13 11:51:18 | Re: Exporting data from PostgreSQL |