Re: [GENERAL] MySQL gets $19.5 MM

From: Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>
To: Ned Lilly <ned(at)nedscape(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] MySQL gets $19.5 MM
Date: 2003-06-09 14:29:52
Message-ID: 1055168992.4604.374.camel@camel
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-general

On Wed, 2003-06-04 at 08:49, Ned Lilly wrote:
> Don't know if anyone's posted this yet...
>
> This, combined with the admittedly weird SAP DB deal, is bad news for PostgreSQL. Today, it's clearly the superior product. It will be tomorrow too. But Betamax was pretty neat too.
>
> PostgreSQL needs more corporate support. Case studies are great, but someone needs to step into the void that Great Bridge created.
>
>

If you can get the venture capital I (and a few others around here)
would be more than willing to try to fill that void. I think we could do
it with far less than 19 million too.

Robert Treat
--
Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Treat 2003-06-09 15:10:34 Re: White Paper
Previous Message Jean-Michel POURE 2003-06-08 15:50:21 Re: [GENERAL] MySQL gets $19.5 MM

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Doug McNaught 2003-06-09 14:45:16 Re: parse errors when connecting to remote host
Previous Message Robert Treat 2003-06-09 14:12:10 Re: Newsgroup Mail server down?