From: | Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Ned Lilly <ned(at)nedscape(dot)com> |
Cc: | "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [GENERAL] MySQL gets $19.5 MM |
Date: | 2003-06-09 14:29:52 |
Message-ID: | 1055168992.4604.374.camel@camel |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-general |
On Wed, 2003-06-04 at 08:49, Ned Lilly wrote:
> Don't know if anyone's posted this yet...
>
> This, combined with the admittedly weird SAP DB deal, is bad news for PostgreSQL. Today, it's clearly the superior product. It will be tomorrow too. But Betamax was pretty neat too.
>
> PostgreSQL needs more corporate support. Case studies are great, but someone needs to step into the void that Great Bridge created.
>
>
If you can get the venture capital I (and a few others around here)
would be more than willing to try to fill that void. I think we could do
it with far less than 19 million too.
Robert Treat
--
Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Treat | 2003-06-09 15:10:34 | Re: White Paper |
Previous Message | Jean-Michel POURE | 2003-06-08 15:50:21 | Re: [GENERAL] MySQL gets $19.5 MM |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Doug McNaught | 2003-06-09 14:45:16 | Re: parse errors when connecting to remote host |
Previous Message | Robert Treat | 2003-06-09 14:12:10 | Re: Newsgroup Mail server down? |