| From: | Rod Taylor <rbt(at)rbt(dot)ca> |
|---|---|
| To: | josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Proposal to Re-Order Postgresql.Conf, part II |
| Date: | 2003-06-05 18:39:36 |
| Message-ID: | 1054838376.7579.46.camel@jester |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, 2003-06-05 at 14:16, Josh Berkus wrote:
> Rod,
>
> > > 4) Does anyone else have any comments on the proposed re-ordering?
> >
> > Since we're painting a shed, does it make sense to put the items in
> > alphabetical order for each section?
>
> I thought about that, yes. However, I find that most items have a logical
> order that is not alphabetical. Take the WAL section for example:
Excellent point.
> BTW, everyone: I do not seem to be receiving any Postgresql.org mail since
> the server crash & restoration. So please cc: any comments directly to me!
You re-subscribed I assume...
--
Rod Taylor <rbt(at)rbt(dot)ca>
PGP Key: http://www.rbt.ca/rbtpub.asc
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Sean Chittenden | 2003-06-05 19:15:56 | Re: Anonymous CVS access |
| Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2003-06-05 18:16:53 | Re: Proposal to Re-Order Postgresql.Conf, part II |