Sequence functions

From: Rod Taylor <rbt(at)rbt(dot)ca>
To: PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Sequence functions
Date: 2003-05-25 03:39:48
Message-ID: 1053833988.279.130.camel@jester
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

We need to track sequence usage in things like defaults. nextval()
function calls don't easily allow this to happen.

The 200N spec has NEXT VALUE FOR <seqname> as the equivalent to
nextval(), which would allow this to happen.

I can make VALUE an IDENT in gram.y to prevent it from becoming a
reserved keyword.

I would also like to add CURRENT VALUE FOR <seqname> for an equivalent
to currval(). CURRENT would need to become a reserved word for this to
happen.

The SQL spec has several reason why CURRENT should be reserved including
several cursor manipulation items (WHERE CURRENT OF), a windowing
function (is this based on cursors?), DISCONNECT, etc.

Any objections to making CURRENT a reserved word?

BTW, VALUE also seems to be used for a special form of unique
constraint. UNIQUE(VALUE) which is equivalent to UNIQUE(SELECT * FROM
<table>).

--
Rod Taylor <rbt(at)rbt(dot)ca>

PGP Key: http://www.rbt.ca/rbtpub.asc

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2003-05-25 03:59:24 Re: Roadmap for FE/BE protocol redesign
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2003-05-25 03:19:56 Re: Roadmap for FE/BE protocol redesign