From: | Ron Johnson <ron(dot)l(dot)johnson(at)cox(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | PgSQL Performance ML <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Looking for a cheap upgrade (RAID) |
Date: | 2003-05-03 20:39:34 |
Message-ID: | 1051994374.1086.13.camel@haggis |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On Fri, 2003-05-02 at 13:53, Chad Thompson wrote:
> I have a server on a standard pc right now.
> PIII 700, 1Gig ram (SD), 40 Gig IDE, RedHat 8.0, PostgreSQL 7.3.1
>
> The database has 3 tables that just broke 10 million tuples (yeah, i think
> im entering in to the world of real databases ;-)
> Its primarly bulk (copy) inserts and queries, rarely an update.
>
> I am looking at moving this to a P4 2.4G, 2 Gig Ram(DDR), RedHat 8,
> PostgreSQL 7.3.latest
[snip]
How big do you expect the database to get?
If I may be a contrarian, if under 70GB, then why not just get a 72GB
10K RPM SCSI drive ($160) and a SCSI 160 card? OS, swap, input files,
etc, can go on a 7200RPM IDE drive.
Much fewer moving parts than RAID, so more reliable...
--
+-----------------------------------------------------------+
| Ron Johnson, Jr. Home: ron(dot)l(dot)johnson(at)cox(dot)net |
| Jefferson, LA USA http://members.cox.net/ron.l.johnson |
| |
| An ad currently being run by the NEA (the US's biggest |
| public school TEACHERS UNION) asks a teenager if he can |
| find sodium and *chloride* in the periodic table of the |
| elements. |
| And they wonder why people think public schools suck... |
+-----------------------------------------------------------+
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Rod Taylor | 2003-05-03 21:16:41 | Re: NOT IN doesn't use index? (fwd) |
Previous Message | brew | 2003-05-03 20:30:38 | Re: why is the db so slow? |