Re: Looking for a cheap upgrade (RAID)

From: Ron Johnson <ron(dot)l(dot)johnson(at)cox(dot)net>
To: PgSQL Performance ML <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Looking for a cheap upgrade (RAID)
Date: 2003-05-03 20:39:34
Message-ID: 1051994374.1086.13.camel@haggis
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On Fri, 2003-05-02 at 13:53, Chad Thompson wrote:
> I have a server on a standard pc right now.
> PIII 700, 1Gig ram (SD), 40 Gig IDE, RedHat 8.0, PostgreSQL 7.3.1
>
> The database has 3 tables that just broke 10 million tuples (yeah, i think
> im entering in to the world of real databases ;-)
> Its primarly bulk (copy) inserts and queries, rarely an update.
>
> I am looking at moving this to a P4 2.4G, 2 Gig Ram(DDR), RedHat 8,
> PostgreSQL 7.3.latest
[snip]

How big do you expect the database to get?

If I may be a contrarian, if under 70GB, then why not just get a 72GB
10K RPM SCSI drive ($160) and a SCSI 160 card? OS, swap, input files,
etc, can go on a 7200RPM IDE drive.

Much fewer moving parts than RAID, so more reliable...

--
+-----------------------------------------------------------+
| Ron Johnson, Jr. Home: ron(dot)l(dot)johnson(at)cox(dot)net |
| Jefferson, LA USA http://members.cox.net/ron.l.johnson |
| |
| An ad currently being run by the NEA (the US's biggest |
| public school TEACHERS UNION) asks a teenager if he can |
| find sodium and *chloride* in the periodic table of the |
| elements. |
| And they wonder why people think public schools suck... |
+-----------------------------------------------------------+

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Rod Taylor 2003-05-03 21:16:41 Re: NOT IN doesn't use index? (fwd)
Previous Message brew 2003-05-03 20:30:38 Re: why is the db so slow?