Re: memory

From: Richard Broersma Jr <rabroersma(at)yahoo(dot)com>
To: Tom Allison <tallison(at)tacocat(dot)net>, pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: memory
Date: 2006-11-10 02:34:10
Message-ID: 105180.7384.qm@web31809.mail.mud.yahoo.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-novice

> I changed the shmmax to ~442MB and changed the shared_buffers from 3000 to 52000.
> The database is MUCH faster, less load on the cpu, but takes 50% of the RAM.
> I don't know how much of the data is cached per se -- but it's an improvement.
>
> Now I probably have to worry about using too much memory...

If you want to have large shared_buffers but not use too much memory, just reduce max_connections
to a reasonable number.

Regards,

Richard Broersma Jr.

In response to

  • Re: memory at 2006-11-10 02:25:34 from Tom Allison

Browse pgsql-novice by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Guido Barosio 2006-11-10 02:50:32 Re: memory
Previous Message Tom Allison 2006-11-10 02:25:34 Re: memory