From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Bruno Wolff III <bruno(at)wolff(dot)to> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: index suggestion for 7.4 |
Date: | 2003-05-30 17:32:39 |
Message-ID: | 10518.1054315959@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Bruno Wolff III <bruno(at)wolff(dot)to> writes:
> Now that expressions can be used in indexes in 7.4 you can have multicolumn
> indexes that are ordered in different directions. However the planner
> doesn't seem to understand that order by -col asc is the same as order by
> col desc (for at least the normal -)
I don't think it should; that's an extremely datatype-dependent bit of
analysis, and the planner does not have any means of ascertaining
whether the equivalency holds for a particular "-" operator and index
opclass.
The correct way to set up this sort of thing would be to build a
"backwards ordering" operator class, not to use an index on "-col".
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Stephan Szabo | 2003-05-30 17:42:24 | Re: index suggestion for 7.4 |
Previous Message | Jeff | 2003-05-30 16:06:58 | Re: Practical sets of SQLSTATE values? |