| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: select_parallel test fails with nonstandard block size |
| Date: | 2016-09-15 15:05:45 |
| Message-ID: | 10511.1473951945@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 10:44 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Well, sure, but at any reasonable value of min_parallel_relation_size
>> that won't be a factor. The question here is whether we want the default
>> value to be platform-independent. I notice that both config.sgml and
>> postgresql.conf.sample claim that the default value is 8MB, which this
>> discussion reveals to be a lie. If you want to keep the default expressed
>> as "1024" and not "(8 * 1024 * 1024) / BLCKSZ", we need to change the
>> documentation.
> I don't particularly care about that. Changing it to 8MB always would
> be fine with me.
OK, I'll take care of it (since I now realize that the inconsistency
is my own fault --- I committed that GUC not you). It's unclear what
this will do for Peter's complaint though.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2016-09-15 15:10:28 | Re: Surprising behaviour of \set AUTOCOMMIT ON |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2016-09-15 15:03:23 | Re: Printing bitmap objects in the debugger |