From: | Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Change to Advocacy Site requested |
Date: | 2003-04-18 21:44:34 |
Message-ID: | 1050702274.9817.1705.camel@camel |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
On Fri, 2003-04-18 at 13:42, Josh Berkus wrote:
> Robert, Justin:
>
> The current "Ask us about PostgreSQL" form on the advocacy site,
> http://advocacy.postgresql.org/request/
>
> ... has options for response time which include "ASAP" and "Immediately".
>
> Given that I am the one now funneling the responses, I feel that this is
> unreasonable and leads to false expectations.
>
> I propose one of two alternatives:
> 1) We remove that drop-down and replace it with the text: "Your question will
> be answered by our volunteers. Please be patient, they will probably get
> back to you within a day or two."
>
> 2) Somebody else take over this duty.
>
Well, I could take over the duty, but my availability isn't 24/7 either
so rewording seems like a good idea. ISTM the real goal here is for
people/companies that need a liaison into the community, and that
technical/licensing questions need to be more strongly funneled off to
the mailing lists. Thoughts?
I've got a few other things to nail down, but I'll try to get to this
over the weekend.
Robert Treat
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2003-04-19 00:23:25 | Re: Change to Advocacy Site requested |
Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2003-04-18 17:42:32 | Change to Advocacy Site requested |