From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Adam Brusselback <adambrusselback(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Christoph Berg <myon(at)debian(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Postgres 10.1 fails to start: server did not start in time |
Date: | 2017-11-10 21:29:17 |
Message-ID: | 10500.1510349357@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Adam Brusselback <adambrusselback(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> You might want to increase pg_ctl's wait timeout for this situation,
>> since the default's evidently too little. However ...
> Got it, thanks.
>> ... pg_ctl itself wouldn't decide to forcibly shut down the server
>> if the timeout expired. It merely stops waiting and tells you so.
>> It seems like this must represent misdesign of whatever start script
>> you're using. I think you need to complain to the Debian packagers
>> about that.
> Hmm, interesting. I installed from this repo:
> http://apt.postgresql.org/pub/repos/apt/ stretch-pgdg main
> I was assuming someone in the Postgres project was involved in
> packaging it. Do you know who I should reach out to in that case?
Christoph's probably a good place to start.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | DrakoRod | 2017-11-10 23:48:25 | Re: Because PostgreSQL is compiling in old versions of OS? |
Previous Message | Joe Conway | 2017-11-10 21:20:28 | Re: Postgres 10.1 fails to start: server did not start in time |