| From: | Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)tm(dot)ee> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Peter Galbavy <peter(dot)galbavy(at)knowtion(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org, pgsql-interfaces(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: More thoughts about FE/BE protocol |
| Date: | 2003-04-10 17:15:56 |
| Message-ID: | 1049994956.1886.34.camel@fuji.krosing.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-interfaces |
Tom Lane kirjutas N, 10.04.2003 kell 19:59:
> Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)tm(dot)ee> writes:
> > Also there should be a way to tell the backend not to send some types of
> > notices/warnings.
>
> We already have that, see client_min_message_level.
What I would like would be possibility to better support interactive
applications, namely updating progress bar by sending some extra
out-of-band info (expected rows, how much work has backend done, etc) as
notices.
At the same time I would like to not get some warnings. Thus just having
min-level is not good enough.
-----------------
Hannu
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Meskes | 2003-04-10 17:20:04 | Re: ECPG thread-safety |
| Previous Message | Barry Lind | 2003-04-10 17:03:09 | Re: More thoughts about FE/BE protocol |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Meskes | 2003-04-10 17:20:04 | Re: ECPG thread-safety |
| Previous Message | Barry Lind | 2003-04-10 17:03:09 | Re: More thoughts about FE/BE protocol |