From: | Reece Hart <reece(at)in-machina(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | SF Postgres <sfpug(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: database aliases? |
Date: | 2003-04-07 18:51:29 |
Message-ID: | 1049741489.26090.0.camel@tallac |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | sfpug |
On Fri, 2003-04-04 at 18:51, David Fetter wrote:
> Would 7.3's new schema system help?
I don't think so. I'm already using schemas to separate elements of the
database which can stand apart. While that's useful, it doesn't capture
what I want.
FWIW, the difficulty in creating an alias to a schema or a database
turns out to be the same: both are primary keys in pg_namespace and
pg_database respectively. Since we can't have two names with the same
oid, hardlink-style aliases (same oid) are impossible; without this
constraint, the problem's still difficult (e.g., drop database would
have to watch reference counts).
Thanks for the replies.
-Reece
--
Reece Hart, Ph.D. rkh(at)gene(dot)com, http://www.gene.com/
Genentech, Inc. 650/225-6133 (voice), -5389 (fax)
Bioinformatics and Protein Engineering
1 DNA Way, MS-93 http://www.in-machina.com/~reece/
South San Francisco, CA 94080-4990 reece(at)in-machina(dot)com, GPG: 0x25EC91A0
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | David Wheeler | 2003-04-30 02:16:27 | OSCON Talk Needed |
Previous Message | Reece Hart | 2003-04-07 17:29:05 | Re: database aliases? |