Re: contrib and licensing

From: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
To: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
Cc: "scott(dot)marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)ihs(dot)com>, mlw <pgsql(at)mohawksoft(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: contrib and licensing
Date: 2003-04-02 23:10:21
Message-ID: 1049325021.18802.18.camel@tokyo
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, 2003-04-02 at 18:00, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> On Wed, 2 Apr 2003, scott.marlowe wrote:
> > True. But not linking to LGPLd libs would be a bit extreme there.
>
> Correct, we've always had libreadline support, as a compile option

Why is that relevant? libreadline is GPL'd, not LGPL'd.

Cheers,

Neil

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dann Corbit 2003-04-02 23:11:54 Re: contrib and licensing
Previous Message cbbrowne 2003-04-02 23:01:05 Re: PostgreSQL and SOAP, suggestions?