From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
Cc: | Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, David Johnston <polobo(at)yahoo(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: psql \d+ and oid display |
Date: | 2014-04-10 23:58:55 |
Message-ID: | 10492.1397174335@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> It also has changed the OID status to only display if it exists. One
> question that came up with Robert is whether OID status should appear
> for \d as well, now that is only shows up when present.
Yeah, I was wondering about that too. If part of the argument here is
to make these two displays act more alike, it seems inconsistent that
one is emitted by \d while the other only comes out with \d+.
Of course, there are two ways to fix that: maybe the replica info
also only belongs in \d+?
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2014-04-11 00:05:11 | Re: psql \d+ and oid display |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2014-04-10 23:50:40 | Re: psql \d+ and oid display |