Re: Keepalives win32

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Pavel Golub <pavel(at)gf(dot)microolap(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Keepalives win32
Date: 2010-06-30 15:09:26
Message-ID: 10492.1277910566@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> I still like #1 because it affects the fewest people, and that option
> uses the RFC defaults only for unset values when others are set.

What's your idea of "affecting the fewest people"? There is no previous
history to be backward-compatible with, because we never supported
keepalive on Windows before.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2010-06-30 15:17:39 Re: Keepalives win32
Previous Message Tom Lane 2010-06-30 15:02:08 Re: Check constraints on non-immutable keys