From: | Rod Taylor <rbt(at)rbt(dot)ca> |
---|---|
To: | Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> |
Cc: | Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: DEFAULT in <set clause list> |
Date: | 2003-03-28 13:23:48 |
Message-ID: | 1048857827.2014.20.camel@jester |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
I'll look into it...
On Mon, 2003-03-24 at 20:14, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
> > <set clause list> (the list of SET expressions in an UPDATE statement;
> > section 14.12) allows a <contextually typed value specification> on the
> > right-hand side of SET assignments. One of the possibilities for a
> > <contextually typed value specification> is DEFAULT (section 6.5).
> >
> > In other words, this syntax should be legal:
> >
> > UPDATE sometable SET somecolumn = DEFAULT;
> >
> > but it doesn't appear to be implemented as of CVS tip.
>
> Hmmm...I ran into a situation where I wanted that just the other day.
> INSERT INTO...SELECT FROM kind of thing...
>
> Chris
--
Rod Taylor <rbt(at)rbt(dot)ca>
PGP Key: http://www.rbt.ca/rbtpub.asc
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | mlw | 2003-03-28 14:01:08 | PostgreSQL and SOAP, version 7.4/8.0 |
Previous Message | Lee Kindness | 2003-03-28 09:37:08 | ECPG thread-safety |