From: | Dave Cramer <Dave(at)micro-automation(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Dieter Cox <dieter_cox(at)hotmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | "pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: possible JDBC bug |
Date: | 2003-03-24 13:59:54 |
Message-ID: | 1048514394.1112.240.camel@inspiron.cramers |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-jdbc |
Deiter,
Nobody has ever tested it under these conditions. Can you send us a
small file to replicate the problem?
Dave
On Mon, 2003-03-24 at 06:46, Dieter Cox wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am having a problem with a program of mine. I am trying to read metadata
> from a vey big database. Now this what happend :
> I created 100+ tables with names like : t1 , t2 , t3 , ... t150. All the
> tables are correctly inserted in the database with their keys all correct.
> When I try to read the metadata for this database, the keys for all tables
> which contain a '0' in their name, are corrupted. I mean that the fields are
> unspecified
> of the names of the fields are cut off !
>
> When i try to do this with a smaller database (eg : 99 tables) all works
> perfect. Above 100 tables it goed wrong.
> I tried making a DB without numbers in table names and this also works
> perfect, even above 250 tables.
>
> Is this a known bug?
>
> i'm using :
> Driver: PostgreSQL Native Driver, PostgreSQL 7.3.1 JDBC3 jdbc driver build
> 108
> DBMS: PostgreSQL, 7.2.2
>
> thx,
>
> Dieter
>
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> MSN Search, for relevant search results! http://search.msn.be
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
> subscribe-nomail command to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org so that your
> message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
--
Dave Cramer <Dave(at)micro-automation(dot)net>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Adam Sherman | 2003-03-24 14:50:30 | Re: connection pooling -Help needed. |
Previous Message | Dieter Cox | 2003-03-24 11:46:08 | possible JDBC bug |