| From: | Dave Cramer <dave(at)fastcrypt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Roadmap for FE/BE protocol redesign |
| Date: | 2003-03-21 16:06:14 |
| Message-ID: | 1048262774.1112.140.camel@inspiron.cramers |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-interfaces |
Tom,
Forgive me for being dense, but how do you delineate this as being a
"language issue"?
Dave
On Fri, 2003-03-21 at 10:54, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > Dave Cramer <dave(at)fastcrypt(dot)com> writes:
> > > I am wondering if it would be possible to return the value of the first
> > > serial field in the row that was incremented on an insert ?
> >
> > That's a language issue, not a protocol issue, and no I'm not taking it
> > on for 7.4.
>
> What I was wondering is if we could create a currval() call that takes
> no arguments, and returns the most recent sequence id assigned.
--
Dave Cramer <dave(at)fastcrypt(dot)com>
Cramer Consulting
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2003-03-21 16:11:15 | Re: Roadmap for FE/BE protocol redesign |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-03-21 15:58:24 | Re: A bad behavior under autocommit off mode |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2003-03-21 16:11:15 | Re: Roadmap for FE/BE protocol redesign |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-03-21 15:54:18 | Re: Roadmap for FE/BE protocol redesign |