Re: Relpartbound, toasting and pg_class

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Relpartbound, toasting and pg_class
Date: 2017-06-12 23:19:34
Message-ID: 1046.1497309574@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> I'm not quite sure where the aversion to adding a toast table to
> pg_class is coming from?

I'm not at all sure it would work, and would rather not introduce
risks of infinite recursion if they're not necessary.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2017-06-12 23:39:05 Re: Re: BUG #14680: startup process on standby encounter a deadlock of TwoPhaseStateLock when redo 2PC xlog
Previous Message Andres Freund 2017-06-12 23:17:34 Re: Relpartbound, toasting and pg_class