Re: [HACKERS] The last configuration file patch (I hope!) This one

From: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
To: mlw <pgsql(at)mohawksoft(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] The last configuration file patch (I hope!) This one
Date: 2003-02-19 02:59:59
Message-ID: 1045623599.582.202.camel@tokyo
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

On Tue, 2003-02-18 at 21:43, mlw wrote:
> This patch enables PostgreSQL to be far more flexible in
> its configuration methodology.

Without weighing in on the configuration debate, one thing this patch
definitely needs to do is update the documentation.

Cheers,

Neil
--
Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> || PGP Key ID: DB3C29FC

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ron Mayer 2003-02-19 03:19:57 Re: Hard problem with concurrency
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2003-02-19 02:55:09 Re: location of the configuration files

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2003-02-19 03:12:15 Re: improve docs on min()/max() performance
Previous Message mlw 2003-02-19 02:43:10 The last configuration file patch (I hope!) This one does it all.