From: | Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)tm(dot)ee> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Kevin Brown <kevin(at)sysexperts(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Detecting corrupted pages earlier |
Date: | 2003-02-18 17:08:50 |
Message-ID: | 1045588130.1702.22.camel@fuji.krosing.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane kirjutas T, 18.02.2003 kell 17:21:
> Kevin Brown <kevin(at)sysexperts(dot)com> writes:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >> The cases I've been able to study look like the header and a lot of the
> >> following page data have been overwritten with garbage --- when it made
> >> any sense at all, it looked like the contents of non-Postgres files (eg,
> >> plain text), which is why I mentioned the possibility of disks writing
> >> data to the wrong sector.
>
> > That also sounds suspiciously like the behavior of certain filesystems
> > (Reiserfs, for one) after a crash when the filesystem prior to the
> > crash was highly active with writes.
I was bitten by it about a year ago as well.
> Isn't reiserfs supposed to be more crash-resistant than ext2, rather
> than less so?
It's supposed to be, but when it is run in (default?)
metadata-only-logging mode, then you can well get perfectly good
metadata with unallocated (zero-filled) data pages. There had been some
more severe errors as well.
-----------------
Hannu
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2003-02-18 17:37:20 | Re: Questions about indexes? |
Previous Message | scott.marlowe | 2003-02-18 17:00:38 | Re: location of the configuration files |