Re: location of the configuration files

From: Martin Coxall <coxall(at)cream(dot)org>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: location of the configuration files
Date: 2003-02-13 11:20:46
Message-ID: 1045135246.915.28.camel@gypsumfantastic.positive-internet.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


> Well, to the extent that you're serious, you understand that
> a lot of people feel that /usr/local should be reserved for
> stuff that's installed by the local sysadmin, and your
> vendor/distro isn't supposed to be messing with it.
>
> Which means if the the vendor installed Postgresql (say, the
> Red Hat Database) you'd expect config files to be in /etc.
> If the postgresql is compiled from source by local admin,
> you might look somewhere in /usr/local.

Indeed. For better or worse, there is a Filesystem Hierarcy Standard,
and most of the important Linux distros, BSDs and some legacy Unixen
stick to it, so so should we.

Configuration files should be in /etc/postgresql/, or at the very least
symlinked from there.

Martin

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Vince Vielhaber 2003-02-13 12:00:11 Re: location of the configuration files
Previous Message Sailesh Krishnamurthy 2003-02-13 10:45:49 set_ps_display on solaris x86