From: | Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | "Patrick S(dot) Riedel" <priedel(at)asllc(dot)net> |
Cc: | pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Convert v7.0.2-2c1 DB |
Date: | 2003-02-11 23:19:23 |
Message-ID: | 1045005563.12931.58.camel@camel |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin |
On Tue, 2003-02-11 at 17:27, Patrick S. Riedel wrote:
> I have a client with a v7.0.2-2c1 database stored on media. The
> database files were stored raw, not dumped. Their current pgsql version
> is 7.1; they do not have v7.0.2-2c1 installed anywhere.
>
> Can I update/add their old db into their new system without installing
> v7.0.2-2c1 onto another system to do a dump?
>
> If I have to install v7.0.2-2c1, where is it? I haven't been able to
> find it on the mirrors. I assume "c1" means it was a release candidate.
>
>
Lordy, that's a fine mess you've got there. I'm fairly certain that it
wont work if you try to run 7.1.x on top of it. You best bet is to
install a 7.0.x somewhere and then try to copy the data files to that
installation. If you can get that working, install a newer version
(7.3.2?) and do a dump out of the 7.0.x database and see what happens.
As far as what version of 7.0.x to use, I don't recognize that release
so it could very well be a release candidate version, but might also be
a vendor/rpm/debian style version tag. Unless one of the developers
comes forward and happens to have a copy of it, I would grab the 7.0.2
release from the ftp server and try that first. If it doesn't work, try
7.0.1, then 7.0.3. (Note there is a 7_0_patches tag in cvs, you could
try to use that though i suspect thats closer to 7.0.3 than 7.0.2, and I
don't know how much faith I have in the CVS tags from 2 years ago.) In
any/all cases, always copy the data over, never do anything on the
original files.
Robert Treat
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Charles Hornberger | 2003-02-11 23:53:00 | Re: PostgreSQL 7.2 + PAM = authentication failure? |
Previous Message | Patrick S. Riedel | 2003-02-11 22:27:28 | Convert v7.0.2-2c1 DB |