From: | Greg Copeland <greg(at)CopelandConsulting(dot)Net> |
---|---|
To: | Cristian Custodio <crstian(at)terra(dot)com(dot)br> |
Cc: | PostgresSQL General Mailing List <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Fw: Priority against catalog |
Date: | 2003-02-11 16:45:25 |
Message-ID: | 1044981924.25889.167.camel@mouse.copelandconsulting.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Change the name of your function.
Regards,
Greg
On Tue, 2003-02-11 at 11:35, Cristian Custodio wrote:
> Thanks for your answer, but I already did this.
>
> Don't you would have another sugestion?
>
> Cristian
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
> To: "Cristian Custodio" <crstian(at)terra(dot)com(dot)br>
> Cc: <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
> Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 12:26 PM
> Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Priority against catalog
>
>
> "Cristian Custodio" <crstian(at)terra(dot)com(dot)br> writes:
> > I created a function called Version(),
> > The same that there is in PostGreSQL Catalog.
>
> > But, to call this function I'm obrigated to=20
> > specific the SCHEMA.Version. I would like it
> > execute my functions when I don't to specific=20=20
> > the SCHEMA.
>
> Change the SEARCH_PATH setting so your schema is in front of
> pg_catalog.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
> (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org)
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
> (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org)
--
Greg Copeland <greg(at)copelandconsulting(dot)net>
Copeland Computer Consulting
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Sullivan | 2003-02-11 16:46:46 | Re: PostgreSQL x Oracle |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2003-02-11 16:44:05 | Re: Is Hash Agg being used? 7.4 seems to handle this query worse than 7.3 |