| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: new --maintenance-db options |
| Date: | 2012-08-23 13:36:23 |
| Message-ID: | 10448.1345728983@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> On Sun, 2012-06-24 at 01:26 +0300, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> About the new --maintenance-db options:
>>
>> Why was this option not added to createuser and dropuser? In the
>> original discussion[0] they were mentioned, but it apparently never
>> made it into the code.
> What should we do with this? Add the option to createuser and dropuser
> now, and think about a more permanent/useful/complete solution in 9.3?
IMO it is now too late for 9.2 ... especially if you're of the opinion
that the current design is bad. Propagating a wrong choice into even
more places doesn't seem like a step forward.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2012-08-23 13:42:18 | Re: to_timestamp() too loose? |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2012-08-23 13:29:55 | Re: xlog file naming |