| From: | Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder <avbidder(at)fortytwo(dot)ch> |
|---|---|
| To: | PostgreSQL Hackers Mailing List <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Survey results from the PostgreSQL portal page |
| Date: | 2003-01-19 14:47:14 |
| Message-ID: | 1042987634.3420.4.camel@altfrangg.fortytwo.ch |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, 2003-01-19 at 15:20, Justin Clift wrote:
>
> Now, we don't necessarily have a speed problem, as people who take the
> time to tune the database can attest to, so this is making me consider
> why such a large percentage of folk would vote for that.
>
> The possibilities that come to mind immediately are:
+ people measure postgresql by the speed of bulk imports
which seem to be faster on other dbs (I'm only repeating what I often
see on the lists), and don't consider that this is not something most
people do on a regular basis.
btw, PITR would get more hits if more people knew what it means... (Yes,
I know what it is, but I think many who don't read the mailing lists
etc. don't).
cheers
-- vbi
--
featured link: http://fortytwo.ch/gpg/subkeys
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Eduardo Stern | 2003-01-19 15:07:27 | Cast and Schemas don't work as expected |
| Previous Message | D'Arcy J.M. Cain | 2003-01-19 14:43:03 | Re: Survey results from the PostgreSQL portal page |