Re: Options for growth

From: Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder <avbidder(at)fortytwo(dot)ch>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Options for growth
Date: 2003-01-16 16:59:19
Message-ID: 1042736358.2269.133.camel@altfrangg.fortytwo.ch
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, 2003-01-16 at 17:42, D'Arcy J.M. Cain wrote:

> We are also looking at hardware solutions, multi-CPU PCs with tons (24GB) of
> memory. I know that memory will improve access if it prevents swapping but
> how well does PostgreSQL utilize multiple CPUs?

At most one CPU is used for any single postgres backend (that means for
any single database connection). So, if your load problem is single
queries being too slow, thee's nothing you can do with adding more CPUs.
If your problem is many connections maxing out the db, PostgreSQL can
take full advantage of multiple CPUs.

Of course, most db apps still are not cpu bound, so you'd have to do
some careful benchmarking first or you'll be spending too much money.

cheers
-- vbi

--
get my gpg key here: http://fortytwo.ch/gpg/92082481

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Neil Conway 2003-01-16 17:23:52 Re: Options for growth
Previous Message Ross J. Reedstrom 2003-01-16 16:50:49 Re: Oracle rant