Re: Oracle rant

From: Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder <avbidder(at)fortytwo(dot)ch>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Oracle rant
Date: 2003-01-16 06:56:02
Message-ID: 1042700162.582.5.camel@altfrangg.fortytwo.ch
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> (i.e. arcane
> little "need to know" things that trap all but the initiated...

So, for postgres, that means:
- a good thing the autovacuum thingy is coming along
- postgres should auto-tune itself - the *cost could perhaps be
adjusted after some statistics have been collected, and there should be
some sensible way to determine an optimal setting for the famous
shared_buffers (and the default should be something that gets reasonable
performance on common cases)

No, I don't expect the second one soon - I know how hard it is. No, I'm
not debating that PostgreSQL is not much, much, much easier to
administrate and set up than Oracle. I'm just saying that there are
*some* small arcane details in postgres, too (although, at least, they
don't affect stability, just performance).

cheers
-- vbi

--
pub 1024D/92082481 2002-02-22 Adrian von Bidder
Key fingerprint = EFE3 96F4 18F5 8D65 8494 28FC 1438 5168 9208 2481

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mark Kirkwood 2003-01-16 07:29:23 Re: Oracle rant
Previous Message Mark Kirkwood 2003-01-16 06:18:47 Re: Oracle rant