Re: \d type queries - why not views in system catalog?!?

From: Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)tm(dot)ee>
To: Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>
Cc: greg(at)turnstep(dot)com, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: \d type queries - why not views in system catalog?!?
Date: 2003-01-13 22:06:55
Message-ID: 1042495615.8396.1.camel@rh72.home.ee
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Robert Treat kirjutas T, 14.01.2003 kell 01:50:
> One of the reasons that this
> was not feasible in the past was that we needed functions that could
> return multiple rows and columns easily. Now that we have that in 7.3,
> it might be worth revisiting.

Also, we have schemas now, so it would be easier to avoid name clashes.

--
Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)tm(dot)ee>

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2003-01-13 22:46:04 Re: targetlist functions part 1 (was [HACKERS] targetlist
Previous Message Robert Treat 2003-01-13 22:00:53 Re: \d type queries - why not views in system catalog?!?