Re: join over 12 tables takes 3 secs to plan

From: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
To: "Charles H(dot) Woloszynski" <chw(at)clearmetrix(dot)com>
Cc: Hilmar Lapp <hlapp(at)gmx(dot)net>, Jeff <threshar(at)torgo(dot)978(dot)org>, "pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: join over 12 tables takes 3 secs to plan
Date: 2003-01-12 01:03:25
Message-ID: 1042333405.386.49.camel@tokyo
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-jdbc pgsql-performance

On Fri, 2003-01-03 at 17:16, Charles H. Woloszynski wrote:
> I think the functionality is starting to become real, but it looks like
> it is starting with some limitations that might restricts its use from
> be maximally realized until 7.4 (or beyond).

Specifically, which limitations in this feature would you like to see
corrected?

Cheers,

Neil
--
Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> || PGP Key ID: DB3C29FC

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-jdbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Mitchell 2003-01-12 01:19:19 Re: Sequence
Previous Message Dave Cramer 2003-01-12 00:50:59 Re: persistent JDBC connections with a daemon

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2003-01-12 04:10:53 Re: "IN" or "=" and "OR"
Previous Message Vernon Wu 2003-01-11 18:51:44 "IN" or "=" and "OR"