From: | Serguei Mokhov <mokhov(at)cs(dot)concordia(dot)ca> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
Cc: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: more adequate usage msg: pg_controldata.diff |
Date: | 2003-01-10 00:51:18 |
Message-ID: | 1042159878.3e1e190695778@mailhost.cs.concordia.ca |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-patches |
Quoting Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>:
> Bruce Momjian writes:
>
> > > I explained in my last message that this patch is wrong. Please revert
> > > it. (DATADIR is not an option and therefore it shouldn't be listed in
> the
> > > options list.)
> >
> > I tried to subtely point out that it is optional.
>
> But the help output is wrong. It lists DATADIR as an option, which it is
> not. (An option is something like -a or --foo. The other things are
> arguments.) See my message to Serguei about how to do it better.
[optional to comment on]: but aren't options are sort of command-line arguments
as well? ;-)
I don't mind either one of them, just as long as they are more or less
consistent with other tools and so that I can finally translate them :)
-s
-------------------------------------------------
This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Ron Peterson | 2003-01-10 02:07:07 | Re: insert rule doesn't see id field |
Previous Message | Serguei Mokhov | 2003-01-10 00:46:42 | Re: more adequate usage msg: pg_controldata.diff |