Re: synchronized code

Yes, that's what I meant... but which are the reasons? Compatibility
must be a preocupation, JDK 1.3 is widely used it, like it or not :-)

On Thu, 2003-01-09 at 18:32, Oliver Jowett wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 09, 2003 at 09:18:18AM -0200, Felipe Schnack wrote:
> > I think you should, you know... J2EE, not really old applications
>
> I don't understand what you mean here..
>
> We're targetting 1.4 instead of 1.3 for reasons that have nothing to do with
> the availability of J2EE servers, if that's what you meant.
>
> > On Thu, 2003-01-09 at 09:06, Oliver Jowett wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jan 09, 2003 at 08:57:19AM -0200, Felipe Schnack wrote:
> > > > Well, I still have the same opinion about this issue... but would be
> > > > really nice to have these same benchmarks run in JDK 1.4 and 1.3 in the
> > > > same machine. I'll try to do it later, I'm downloading the sources.
> > >
> > > Ok, I'll see if I can fit it in tomorrow (but we're not targetting 1.3
> > > ourselves, so it's lower priority)
>
> -O
--

Felipe Schnack
Analista de Sistemas
felipes(at)ritterdosreis(dot)br
Cel.: (51)91287530
Linux Counter #281893

Centro Universitário Ritter dos Reis
http://www.ritterdosreis.br
ritter(at)ritterdosreis(dot)br
Fone/Fax.: (51)32303341