[Fwd: Re: [GENERAL] 7.3 Prepared statements]

You guys are subscribed to pgsql-general?
I think thsi thread is quite nice, about prepared statements in the
low-level communication protocol with the server (right now plain SQL is
used to do it)
New changes in the driver? :-)
I was just guessing, probably will need separated 7.4 and 7.3 and
older implementations?
-----Forwarded Message-----

> From: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
> To: Alan Gutierrez <ajglist(at)izzy(dot)net>
> Cc: PostgreSQL General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
> Subject: Re: [GENERAL] 7.3 Prepared statements
> Date: 08 Jan 2003 22:02:15 -0500
>
> On Tue, 2003-01-07 at 08:00, Alan Gutierrez wrote:
> > Are any hackers working on a protocol level implementation? Has it been deemed
> > unnecessary?
>
> There was some talk about doing a protocol-level implementation in 7.4.
> Since it would require a change in the FE/BE protocol (naturally), it
> would be nice to do it at the same time as a bunch of proposed minor
> cleanups to the FE/BE protocol, so we can do everything in one fell
> swoop.
>
> One benefit of a protocol-level implementation is that the data passed
> to the EXECUTE would be able to bypass the parser -- so if you're
> inserting gigabytes of text strings, it can avoid a potential
> bottleneck.
>
> > This may be an area where I could help with some C development.
>
> Please do. I'm a bit busy w/ school at the moment, but if you have any
> questions, I'd be happy to help.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Neil
> --
> Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> || PGP Key ID: DB3C29FC
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
> (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org)
--

Felipe Schnack
Analista de Sistemas
felipes(at)ritterdosreis(dot)br
Cel.: (51)91287530
Linux Counter #281893

Centro Universitário Ritter dos Reis
http://www.ritterdosreis.br
ritter(at)ritterdosreis(dot)br
Fone/Fax.: (51)32303341