From: | Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Alan Gutierrez <ajglist(at)izzy(dot)net> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: 7.3 Prepared statements |
Date: | 2003-01-09 03:02:15 |
Message-ID: | 1042081335.376.10.camel@tokyo |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-jdbc |
On Tue, 2003-01-07 at 08:00, Alan Gutierrez wrote:
> Are any hackers working on a protocol level implementation? Has it been deemed
> unnecessary?
There was some talk about doing a protocol-level implementation in 7.4.
Since it would require a change in the FE/BE protocol (naturally), it
would be nice to do it at the same time as a bunch of proposed minor
cleanups to the FE/BE protocol, so we can do everything in one fell
swoop.
One benefit of a protocol-level implementation is that the data passed
to the EXECUTE would be able to bypass the parser -- so if you're
inserting gigabytes of text strings, it can avoid a potential
bottleneck.
> This may be an area where I could help with some C development.
Please do. I'm a bit busy w/ school at the moment, but if you have any
questions, I'd be happy to help.
Cheers,
Neil
--
Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> || PGP Key ID: DB3C29FC
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Magnus Naeslund(f) | 2003-01-09 03:06:24 | Re: PostgreSQL + Visual Basic .NET |
Previous Message | Boget, Chris | 2003-01-09 00:37:13 | How can I do this? |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Oliver Jowett | 2003-01-09 10:39:13 | Re: synchronized code |
Previous Message | Joseph Shraibman | 2003-01-09 00:26:33 | Re: Character Encoding WAS: ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException in Encoding.decodeUTF8() |