Re: 7.3 Prepared statements

From: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
To: Alan Gutierrez <ajglist(at)izzy(dot)net>
Cc: PostgreSQL General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: 7.3 Prepared statements
Date: 2003-01-09 03:02:15
Message-ID: 1042081335.376.10.camel@tokyo
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-jdbc

On Tue, 2003-01-07 at 08:00, Alan Gutierrez wrote:
> Are any hackers working on a protocol level implementation? Has it been deemed
> unnecessary?

There was some talk about doing a protocol-level implementation in 7.4.
Since it would require a change in the FE/BE protocol (naturally), it
would be nice to do it at the same time as a bunch of proposed minor
cleanups to the FE/BE protocol, so we can do everything in one fell
swoop.

One benefit of a protocol-level implementation is that the data passed
to the EXECUTE would be able to bypass the parser -- so if you're
inserting gigabytes of text strings, it can avoid a potential
bottleneck.

> This may be an area where I could help with some C development.

Please do. I'm a bit busy w/ school at the moment, but if you have any
questions, I'd be happy to help.

Cheers,

Neil
--
Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> || PGP Key ID: DB3C29FC

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Naeslund(f) 2003-01-09 03:06:24 Re: PostgreSQL + Visual Basic .NET
Previous Message Boget, Chris 2003-01-09 00:37:13 How can I do this?

Browse pgsql-jdbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Oliver Jowett 2003-01-09 10:39:13 Re: synchronized code
Previous Message Joseph Shraibman 2003-01-09 00:26:33 Re: Character Encoding WAS: ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException in Encoding.decodeUTF8()