Re: ALTER TABLE .. SET WITH / WITHOUT OIDS

From: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Rod Taylor <rbt(at)rbt(dot)ca>, PostgreSQL Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: ALTER TABLE .. SET WITH / WITHOUT OIDS
Date: 2003-01-09 02:58:15
Message-ID: 1042081095.375.5.camel@tokyo
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

On Thu, 2003-01-02 at 18:08, Tom Lane wrote:
> I can see some value in the SET WITHOUT OIDS half of the patch, as this
> gives a way of reclaiming space in a table that was unthinkingly created
> with OIDs. But I'm not sure we should expend the code space to provide
> just a one-way transformation.

IMHO, it's still worth having this part of the patch, even if the
transformation is only one-way.

Cheers,

Neil

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2003-01-09 02:59:25 Re: ALTER TABLE .. SET WITH / WITHOUT OIDS
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2003-01-09 02:55:49 Re: minor doc improvements