Re: SQL alternative to pg_dump

From: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
To: Envex Developments <mwagner(at)envex(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: SQL alternative to pg_dump
Date: 2002-12-18 23:58:22
Message-ID: 1040255902.354.124.camel@tokyo
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Wed, 2002-12-18 at 01:19, Envex Developments wrote:
> However, since many of the servers hosting the software won't have
> PostgreSQL installed locally, there'll be no pg_dump.

You can use pg_dump to dump a remote database; on the machine you're
running pg_dump from, you'll need to install libpq and pg_dump, but not
the rest of PostgreSQL.

> Is there an alternate of pg_dump, which can be run as SQL statement(s)?

Not AFAIK.

Cheers,

Neil

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2002-12-19 00:06:37 Re: trouble caused by change in 7.3 handling of '' in
Previous Message Tom Lane 2002-12-18 23:52:45 Re: trouble caused by change in 7.3 handling of '' in