From: | Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> |
Cc: | Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: MySQL 4.1 Features |
Date: | 2002-12-18 23:24:20 |
Message-ID: | 1040253860.356.67.camel@tokyo |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 2002-12-18 at 01:49, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
> Looks like they've caught up on a lot of our features. I have to say I
> appreciate them adding SERIAL as an alias for AUTO_INCREMENT. Perhaps we
> should return the favour? :)
Well, it's not the same as PostgreSQL's serial (which is a 32-bit NOT
NULL incrementing integer -- MySQL's serial is a 64-bit unique, NOT NULL
incrementing integer).
Personally, I think the implementations are different enough that making
AUTO_INCREMENT an alias for SERIAL on the PostgreSQL side of things
would just confuse the situation further...
Cheers,
Neil
--
Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> || PGP Key ID: DB3C29FC
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2002-12-18 23:39:05 | Re: 7.3.1 stamped |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-12-18 21:28:13 | Re: 7.3.1 stamped |