| From: | Greg Copeland <greg(at)CopelandConsulting(dot)Net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl>, "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp>, raanders(at)acm(dot)org, PostgresSQL Hackers Mailing List <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Update on replication |
| Date: | 2002-12-18 03:08:48 |
| Message-ID: | 1040180928.7047.25.camel@mouse.copelandconsulting.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, 2002-12-17 at 20:55, Neil Conway wrote:
> On Tue, 2002-12-17 at 21:33, Greg Copeland wrote:
> > I do agree, GBorg needs MUCH higher visibility!
>
> I'm just curious: why do we need GBorg at all? Does it offer anything
> that SourceForge, or a similar service does not offer?
>
> Especially given that (a) most other OSS projects don't have a site for
> "related projects" (unless you count something like CPAN, which is
> totally different) (b) GBorg is completely unknown to anyone outside the
> PostgreSQL community and even to many people within it...
>
Part I can answer, part I can not. Since I'm not the one that pushed
the projects to that site, I can't answer that part of the equation.
Addressing the part of your question that I think I can, I do like the
concept of one-stop-shopping for all PostgreSQL needs. All Things
ProgreSQL is a pretty neat concept. Of course, it rather defeats the
whole purpose if no one, including potential developers, have no idea it
exists.
--
Greg Copeland <greg(at)copelandconsulting(dot)net>
Copeland Computer Consulting
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Neil Conway | 2002-12-18 03:09:46 | Re: Update on replication |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-12-18 03:00:36 | Re: Update on replication |