From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
Cc: | Jeff Davis <jdavis-pgsql(at)empires(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: ARC patent |
Date: | 2005-01-17 20:57:53 |
Message-ID: | 10400.1105995473@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
"Joshua D. Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> The biggest problem is going to be that if we release 8 with
> the patented stuff, then for a minimum of 3 years there will
> be liability for anyone running 8.
Do you honestly think that this is the only patented algorithm anywhere
in there?
Now that we've been made aware that there is a pending (one more time:
pending, not issued) patent on it, we will work on removing the affected
code in an orderly fashion. I don't think there is need for panic.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Serguei Mokhov | 2005-01-17 20:58:38 | Re: [pgsql-ru-general] [HACKERS] Final call for translation updates |
Previous Message | Zeugswetter Andreas DAZ SD | 2005-01-17 20:56:00 | Re: ARC patent |