Re: ARC patent

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Jeff Davis <jdavis-pgsql(at)empires(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: ARC patent
Date: 2005-01-17 20:57:53
Message-ID: 10400.1105995473@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"Joshua D. Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> The biggest problem is going to be that if we release 8 with
> the patented stuff, then for a minimum of 3 years there will
> be liability for anyone running 8.

Do you honestly think that this is the only patented algorithm anywhere
in there?

Now that we've been made aware that there is a pending (one more time:
pending, not issued) patent on it, we will work on removing the affected
code in an orderly fashion. I don't think there is need for panic.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Serguei Mokhov 2005-01-17 20:58:38 Re: [pgsql-ru-general] [HACKERS] Final call for translation updates
Previous Message Zeugswetter Andreas DAZ SD 2005-01-17 20:56:00 Re: ARC patent