From: | Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Bret Hughes <bhughes(at)elevating(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL idocs |
Date: | 2002-12-12 18:54:23 |
Message-ID: | 1039719264.3453.61.camel@camel |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Just use reply-to-all from evolution. Historically there have been times
when posting via the mailing lists have been slow, so direct emails have
become a defacto standard for these lists, with the list being cc'd to
archive things.
Robert Treat
On Thu, 2002-12-12 at 13:33, Bret Hughes wrote:
> Sorry to Scott for the reply to his mail only. I wish evolution would
> reply to the list automatically instead of the original sender. Is
> there a historical reason these lists do not use a
> Reply-To:pgsql-whatever(at)postgresql(dot)org in the headers?
>
> On Thu, 2002-12-12 at 10:15, scott.marlowe wrote:
> > On Thu, 12 Dec 2002, Francois Suter wrote:
> >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > I don't know who is responsible for the PostgreSQL's interactive
> > > documentation so I'm writing to the general ML.
>
> While we are on the subject of docs, I will show my ignorance and ask
> how do I convert the sgml doc provided in the redhat rpms to html for
> local reading? then I could search my own doc tree.
>
> I don't know (*&%# about sgml. I tried sqml2html but it barfed telling
> me that it only understood linuxdoc format. I have to admit I only spent
> about 30 minutes looking for the solution.
>
> Bret
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
> (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org)
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Johnson, Shaunn | 2002-12-12 18:59:14 | problems updating table |
Previous Message | Bret Hughes | 2002-12-12 18:33:54 | Re: PostgreSQL idocs |