| From: | Oliver Elphick <olly(at)lfix(dot)co(dot)uk> |
|---|---|
| To: | Dmitri Touretsky <dmitri(at)listsoft(dot)ru> |
| Cc: | pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Yet one more stupid question |
| Date: | 2002-12-04 20:39:48 |
| Message-ID: | 1039034387.11430.923.camel@linda.lfix.co.uk |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-novice |
On Wed, 2002-12-04 at 18:00, Dmitri Touretsky wrote:
> One more question related to performance. I have a VERY BIG table
> (abot 20 million records) which is accessed relatively seldom, like
> once a day (basically, it's archived data which sometimes may be
> needed). How this table affect performance of the database? Is it
> worse to create another database for storing this data, and keep the
> main DB small?
It will make no difference to performance except when it is being used.
--
Oliver Elphick Oliver(dot)Elphick(at)lfix(dot)co(dot)uk
Isle of Wight, UK http://www.lfix.co.uk/oliver
GPG: 1024D/3E1D0C1C: CA12 09E0 E8D5 8870 5839 932A 614D 4C34 3E1D 0C1C
========================================
"Behold, happy is the man whom God correcteth.
Therefore despise thou not the chastening of the
Almighty." Job 5:17
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Oliver Elphick | 2002-12-04 20:41:38 | Re: problem creating database.. |
| Previous Message | Devinder K Rajput | 2002-12-04 20:30:18 | Re: Copy entire file as one field |