From: | Rod Taylor <rbt(at)rbt(dot)ca> |
---|---|
To: | Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Philip Warner <pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: toast table growing indefinitely? Known |
Date: | 2002-12-02 20:36:41 |
Message-ID: | 1038861401.46704.86.camel@jester |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> > I've increased the value to 40000 since we have much busier days, and I'll
> > se what happens.
>
> Hang on - so when vacuum runs it knows exactly how many pages it cleaned up
> but if the fsm value is low, it doesn't help? Why don't we just
> automaticlaly set the FSM value to the max that vacuum has to clean up? Why
> don't we introduce: max_fsm_pages = auto or something?
I assume it uses shared memory, so I doubt it's very easy to increase on
the fly -- without having to reduce something else anyway.
--
Rod Taylor <rbt(at)rbt(dot)ca>
PGP Key: http://www.rbt.ca/rbtpub.asc
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Treat | 2002-12-02 20:45:22 | Re: protecting prosrc (was Re: [GENERAL] USAGE on schema allowed by |
Previous Message | Rod Taylor | 2002-12-02 20:34:42 | Re: ALTER TABLE schema SCHEMA TO new_schema? |