From: | Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Kieran <kieran(at)dunelm(dot)org(dot)uk>, "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Enterprise readiness - mirroring / incremental backup |
Date: | 2002-11-19 14:55:11 |
Message-ID: | 1037717711.23925.23.camel@camel |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Tue, 2002-11-19 at 09:08, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Kieran wrote:
>
> > My last question is somewhat pie-in-the sky, but assuming that
> > PostgreSQL cannot currently meet requirements 3 & 4 even with 3rd party
> > solutions, what are people's gut reactions to whether a small team (e.g.
> > 5-6) of experienced, full-time paid developers could add mirroring and
> > incremental backup support to PostgreSQL within 18 months?
>
> Easily done. We have a point-in-time recovery patch ready for 7.4
> already. Full multi-master replication is being worked on at:
>
> http://gborg.postgresql.org/project/pgreplication/projdisplay.php
>
Maybe I am overly optimistic, but I would think you could do this within
6 months without too much trouble with a team of 5-6 developers working
on it. You could probably cut back on developers and hire consulting
services from one of the postgresql support companies that already have
a replication solution.
Robert Treat
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruno Wolff III | 2002-11-19 14:57:09 | Re: Stored Procedures |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2002-11-19 14:54:39 | Re: help in starting up / shutting down postgres as another user |