| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Apple's ranlib warns about protocol_openssl.c |
| Date: | 2021-12-16 18:22:34 |
| Message-ID: | 1037477.1639678954@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 4:48 AM Peter Eisentraut
> <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>> These are not errors, right? So why is this a problem?
> Yeah they're just warnings. I don't personally care if we just ignore
> them until we drop OpenSSL < 1.1.0 or macOS < 10.something. I
> mentioned it because in the past we worked to get rid of these sorts
> of warnings (there have been a couple of rounds at least), and they
> show up more obviously in the CI scripts because they use -s, so the 3
> warning lines are the only output.
Yeah, "zero chatter from a successful build" has been a goal
for awhile now.
Having said that, I'm not seeing any such warning when I build
with openssl 1.1.1k on my own Mac, so I'm a bit confused why
Thomas sees it.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joshua Brindle | 2021-12-16 18:31:58 | Re: Granting SET and ALTER SYSTE privileges for GUCs |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2021-12-16 18:08:46 | Re: Confused comment about drop replica identity index |