From: | Dave Cramer <Dave(at)micro-automation(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | karlgold(at)yahoo(dot)com |
Cc: | PostgreSQL JDBC List <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: |
Date: | 2002-11-05 17:25:36 |
Message-ID: | 1036517136.25524.17.camel@inspiron.cramers |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-jdbc |
Unfortunately, until the backend gives us usefull error codes, there's
not much we can do about catching exceptions intelligently.
And yes, the behaviour is intended, once a transaction has failed, you
need to end, or roll it back
Dave
On Tue, 2002-11-05 at 12:19, Karl Goldstein wrote:
> I don't have a strong opinion either way. For me, the main problem with the current behavior is
> simply that the error message is confusing. If it is indeed the case that any SQLException
> invalidates the current transaction (and my impression is that this is not intended), then the
> driver should report that directly and not even let you try to execute later statements. The "No
> results were returned by the query" error just left me scratching my head.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Karl
>
> --- Daniel Serodio <daniel(at)checkforte(dot)com(dot)br> wrote:
> > I've never worked with Oracle, just MySQL and PostgreSQL, but isn't this
> > the definition of a transaction?
> >
> > "A transaction is an atomic unit of processing; it is eigher performed
> > in its entirety or not at all"
> >
> > My understanding of this is that if one statement failed, all of the
> > following statements should fail.
> >
> > On Tue, 2002-11-05 at 14:31, Csaba Nagy wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > I was wondering if there's any chance of this behavior to change in the
> > > future ?
> > > I mean will it be possible to continue a transaction after one of the SQLs
> > > failed, by only rolling back what that query did ?
> > > In many real life applications recovery is very possible after a failed
> > > query, and (the not failed part of) the transaction should be committed.
> > > This is one of the big differences in behavior between Postgres and Oracle,
> > > making life hard for porting...
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > > Csaba.
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> HotJobs - Search new jobs daily now
> http://hotjobs.yahoo.com/
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org
--
Dave Cramer <Dave(at)micro-automation(dot)net>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Csaba Nagy | 2002-11-05 17:29:23 | Re: |
Previous Message | Karl Goldstein | 2002-11-05 17:19:59 | Re: |